Adding Depth Strobist Style
When photographing conferences, sometimes I have more than enough light to work with on stage. Sometimes I don't. When I don't have enough light on stage, I pull out the portable strobes and set up lights, using all sorts of things I've learned from the Strobist blog. For example, my recent gig shooting at OnCopyright 2008, I lit all the speaker shots with with two Canon 580 EX strobes and CTO gels. The lights were set up in such a way to mimic the traditional theater lights that were in use at the show, but which were just not putting out enough light.
Here's a shot of Clay Shirky on stage at OnCopyright, totally lit strobist style:
At last week's Where 2.0 Conference, I had just enough light to work with, thanks to a proper lighting truss set up in front of the stage. Working with Chris Legrand, the lighting designer, I was able to nail in a good set of settings for shooting the conference while preserving the background lighting design and was pretty happy with the results. Don't get me wrong, I didn't have a lot of light up there. I was shooting 1/100@f/4.0 ISO 1600. But, it worked and if I had added my own light to the stage, I would have started washing out the colors on the backdrop.
Here's a shot of the mashup panel on the Where 2.0 stage using just the conference stage lighting:
When looking at these kind of wide shots of the stage, I'm always of two minds about whether I like the audience in silhouette. On the one hand, it's very punchy and graphical. On the other, the audience turns into a 2D layer and doesn't have any depth.
Seeing a possibility to do more, I decided to try an experiment to see if I could add some depth to the audience. I broke out two strobes and set them up on the right and left of the room and aimed them up at the ceiling to reflect light down into the audience in front of the stage, being careful not to push much light onto the stage itself.
Here's the setup in action:
As you can see, the result is depth in the audience and a different sense of layering in the composition. I'm still split on which way I prefer things to be, but I think that different shots will want different treatments. Now that I've sorted out how to do this, it becomes a choice rather than an enforced mandate.
A cool part about the setup I engineered is that I was able to use the same exposure whether or not I was pushing light into the audience. It took a bit of experimentation along the way, but after a couple of tweaks, I had things balanced just right, including using 3/4 CTO worth of gels to match color balance with the stage. If I was shooting tight and didn't have audience in the frame, I would turn off my PocketWizard transmitter and shoot away. But, when I did want to have light on the audience, all I needed to do was flip a switch.
Best of all, I was able to use this lighting setup to capture audience shots. I found all I needed to do was open up a stop to f/2.8 and I could work interesting shots at various places in the audience, such as this one:
Learning to light over the last few years has been a very enjoyable journey. It's a revelation when you turn the corner from thinking about lighting as a binary decision between existing light and not. But that revelation doesn't come all at once. Instead, it's like so much of photography in that it reveals itself in stages. A bit here and a bit there. Each little experiment helps open up a new range of possibilities.





6 Comments
I prefer the audience silhouetted. I think it frames the subjects better. With the audience in clear view, it sort of takes the focus off of the presenter (where it should be) and gives unnatural visual priority to the audience members.
My two cents of course, but I'm not a pro photographer. Just a pro viewer ;-)
Reply to this comment
I'm in favor of no audience at all, and when you must, in silhouette personally.
Same disclaimer as above, though.
Reply to this comment
Indeed. As I said, I'm split on the issue myself. And, it'd probably not be an issue at all except for the fact that a client is paying for the images. From a marketing perspective, conference clients are often interested in the audience, sometimes to the exclusion of all else. For example, I have one conference client that totally de-emphasizes speakers and only wants audience shots.
Personally, my favorite shots from the conferences are the really tight ones of speakers. But, I gots to do more than that in the course of a day. :)
Reply to this comment
I really appreciate you sharing your knowledge and your experience as you grow your skill and art. It's inspiring and affirming as we challenge ourselves to do the same.
Reply to this comment
I'm still very early in learning about lighting, so this is probably a pretty basic question. But, does the PocketWizard you mention allow you to control the two pairs of strobes independently (i.e. the ones with the gels that are supplementing the stage vs. the ones lighting the audience)? I haven't used a PocketWizard - only on-camera flash.
Also, just out of curiosity, do you find yourself using something like a Sekonic light meter during event prep to help you get the lighting to the level you want or are you able to do all of your work with the light meter in the camera?
I guess I need to spend some quality time on Strobist.
Reply to this comment
Michael: Thanks! And it's not just a one way street. I always learn something from posting these tidbits.
Mike: The pocket wizards I have, the entry level model, let you choose between four channels. So, you could have one set of strobes set to channel 1 and another set to channel 2 and choose which channel you want to transmit on. And, sometimes I do use my Sekonic light meter to help out in prep. But, when I'm needing to work quickly, or change settings on the fly during an event, I'll just eyeball my exposures using the histogram on my camera.
Strobist is a good place to spend some time, but be warned: it's addictive!
Reply to this comment
Leave a comment