Changing Your Point of View
A sure way to photographic dullsville is to take a picture from the same point of view that everyone sees the same scene from day in and day out. For example, imagine you’re walking down your neighborhood sidewalk. If you stop on the sidewalk at any particular point and simply lift your camera up to your eye and snap, the result is something you would see every day. It could be interesting, but the point of view that the photograph was made from definitely works against it.
Now, imagine that you’ve dropped down to one knee resulting in a net decrease of elevation of a foot and a half or so. For any particular subject, you’ve just increased your chances of making something visually interesting. Now, get on your stomach and repeat.
To illustrate my point, one of my all time favorite conference shots came while I was sitting in the audience at RailsConf Europe in London. While goofing with my camera, I decided to try a seat level shot looking back at the audience as they were paying attention to the speaker. Here’s the result.
I think that if I had made that photograph from eye level, it would have probably been boring and hit the bit bucket. But, from a more novel point of view, it picks up a lot of interesting qualities very quickly, not the least is that it gives a fresh perspective.
Another example is this shot I made earlier in the year at Boiler Bay on the Oregon Coastline:
To get this shot, I placed my camera on top of the curb of a parking lot and used a large puddle as a reflecting pond. People walked by me and wondered what the hell I was doing and made some rather interesting comments. Little did they know what they were missing out on. Of course, I think I got my jeans pretty dirty that evening, but oh well.
I wish I knew more about the psychology behind this, but my guess is that we as humans are visually stimulated by novel points of view. If it’s something we’ve seen before, well, it’s just not as visually stimulating as a photo taken that we’ve not ever been able to see with our own eyes. Maybe this is wired up into the way our perception of the world is significantly composed of recall from memory. When we see something that doesn’t fit in our mental database, it forces us to really look at it instead of glossing over it and letting the details fill in from other things we’ve seen just like it. I realize I’m wildly speculating here, but it seems to make sense based on the limited understanding I have of the matter. (And, if you have pointers, feel free to leave a comment! I’d love to know more!)
Seattle-based photographer (and all around great guy) Chase Jarvis is awesome at finding novel points of view to make photographs from. He's been noodling on this problem for a while and goes to the extreme of rigging cameras with remote triggers in places where no human eyeball typically is, such as right in front of a biker traveling down a mountain road. Check out this video for some highlights and inspiration:
Another great YouTube example is Joe McNally's story of photographing the changing of a light bulb. Not just any light bulb mind you, but the one on the very top of the Empire State Building.
Bottom line: Find an unusual point of view and you’re well on your way to making an interesting photograph. I’m not going to say that you should avoid the zone 5' to 6' above the ground, but you certainly can’t hurt your chances by getting out of that zone of view.
Follow up: Bill Bumgarner has posted a follow up including several examples from his photo collection.



7 Comments
It's interesting how this sense of point of view changes with technology.
The BBC's ‘The Genius of Photography’ documentary showed one of the big changes wrought by the 35mm cameras: because of the easier handling of the small camera and its eye-level viewfinder, the 35mm photographer had a new and different point of view. The documentary contrasted that to the then-current use of waist-level finders in twin-reflex cameras, heavy press cameras, or the earlier ground glass in view cameras.
One can move in both directions, of course: my shots with my 1950s Rollei TLR have a novel feel in part because the waist-level view is the TLR's nature. And I'm sure a similar argument could be made about today's P&S cameras that have no eye-level viewfinder: I'd guess there's more closeups and self-referential photography being done than with the usual SLR point of view.
Reply to this comment
Thanks for the nod, Duncan. Indeed, shifting one's perspective is great advice. And thanks for introducing me to Joe's vid - I hadn't seen that before, even though we're pals!
Still loving your blog,
Chase
Reply to this comment
New perspectives are a lot of fun, certainly. One of the most liberating things to me about getting some decent wide-angle glass was the ability to simply preset focus with a tight aperture and then move the camera dramatically between shots. I get to be surprised by what comes out, which is a notable difference from the usual compose, shoot, chimp cycle of DSLR shooting.
My current favorite trick is putting my D200 + 12-24mm on a monopod, setting the self-timer, and holding the 'pod from the lower end to raise the camera 10 feet or so into the air. This shot was one of my early successes with that techqniue.
Reply to this comment
John: I love the waist-level look. And, yeah, I guess we’re always in a push-pull with novelty just like with the comings and goings in the worlds of fashion and design.
Chase: You’re welcome, of course. Joe’s vid is super amazing. And, even better, I’m loving that we’re getting more and more of a glimpse at how other people approach and make their shots. It’s really quite motivating.
Lennon: Oh yah, that’s really cool. Now you just need to rig up a remote cable release and run with it. Well, maybe not literally _run_, but :)
Reply to this comment
Great article and photo!
I'm both a Psychology major at UCLA and a photographer. I find that basically all of my photos, from the deer in the woods to my friend in the pool are all more interesting when I'm taking them at more unique perspectives. As for why we are more attracted to these unique perspectives - my guess is what, in Psychology, is called Habituation and is most commonly used in infant psych studies. Habituation occurs when an infant essentially gets bored of a new stimulus that has been introduced. The child becomes accustomed to seeing the stimulus and no longer finds it intriguing. When a different new stimulus is introduced, the child responds and then habituates to it. It is a form of integration into our world, so when we see these new photographic perspectives - novel stimuli - we are drawn to them.
Reply to this comment
I agree with Lennon that the monopod trick can produce some pretty wacky results - particularly using an ultra-wide angle. A remote trigger can make this even more powerful. The monopod trick is also useful for off-camera-flash ("strobe on a rope").
I'm looking forward to taking more and more shots from a low-perspective as I try and empathise more with children. From Architecture to Adults, we usually don't give enough thought to how the world looks from their point of view. All credit to you Duncan for increasing usability by taking the camera down a peg or two.
[I tried to login with Wordpress to leave this comment but couldn't, by the way}.
Reply to this comment
Melissa: Thanks for chiming in with the link about habituation.
ConorwithoneN: I’ve logged in and out using Wordpress a few times. I’m not sure what the problem is/was. I’ll try it again in a few days and see if I can reproduce. Thanks for the heads up.
Reply to this comment
Leave a comment