Canon DSLR Timeline Speculation
I’ve been asked a few times in the last couple of days when Canon might be releasing an update to one of their existing digital SLRs. Obviously, I’m no insider. More to the point, after talking publicly about my problems with the 1D Mark III and subsequently going dual system and loving it, Canon’s not likely to tell me bloody anything. That’s OK. We can look at the release record for Canon’s digital SLR product lines and do a bit of armchair speculation. (If you’re impatient, skip right to the summary.)
First off, let’s look at the longest running line in the Canon Digital SLR line up, the x0D series:
- Canon D30, announced 05/2000, shipped 09/2000
- Canon D60, announced 02/2002, 17 months later
- Canon 10D, announced 02/2003, 12 months later
- Canon 20D, announced 08/2004, 18 months later
- Canon 30D, announced 02/2006, 18 months later
- Canon 40D, announced 08/2007, 18 months later
- Canon 50D, announced 08/2008, 12 months later
Except for a fast release of the of the 10D in 2003 and then later the 50D in 2008, the natural cycle is hanging out in the 18 month range. The 50D especially is a bit of an odd duck as it didn’t officially replace the 40D. You can still buy the 40D new. It’ll be interesting to see if the 40D remains in production past February of this year, which would otherwise be its time to bow out. No matter, I’d be highly surprised of there’s a new camera in this line before August of this year. Furthermore, with the economic slow down hitting camera sales, I wouldn’t be surprised at all if the natural cycle asserted itself and Canon doesn’t refresh this line until February of 2010.
Note, I based the period between the D30 and D60 on the shipping of the D30, not the announcement. The D30 was pre-announced by a large margin. On the other hand, the variability in announce and ship dates after the first camera aren’t as important to track, in my book. We’re doing armchair speculation, after all.
Next, let’s look at the Rebel.
- Canon Rebel 300D, announced 08/2003
- Canon Rebel 350D (XT), announced 02/2005, 18 months later
- Canon Rebel 400D (XTi), announced 08/2006, 18 months later
- Canon Rebel 450D (XSi), announce 01/2008, 17 months later
That’s about as regular a pattern as you can ask for. It’s pretty obvious that Canon is regularly sorting out what amount of technology they can put into a Rebel at a particular price point and doing it every year and a half. Look for the next one in this line in July or August of this year. As regular as the release cycle has been, I’d almost be willing to put money down on it.
How does the Rebel XS (aka Canon Rebel 1000D, announced 06/2008) fit into this? We’ll, that’s a good question. As the first sub-$500 digital SLR, it could be on a completely different schedule than its big brother. Or, it could be on an alternating schedule so that Canon can have more frequent announcements in the Rebel series. We’ll have to wait and see.
Ok, so that’s the low end. How about the other side of the spectrum and the 1D series?
- Canon 1D, announced 09/2001, shipped 12/2001
- Canon 1D mkII, announced 01/2004, 37 months later
- Canon 1D mkIIn, announced 08/2005, 19 months later
- Canon 1D mkIII, announced 02/2007, 18 months later, 37 months after the mkII
As with the x0D series, I’m using the shipping date for first model in the series to base later time periods from. Also, it’s important to note that the Mark IIn was a minor update with a larger screen and improved electronics. Thus, the additional notation of the time period between the Mark II and Mark III.
Ignoring the Mark IIn, the 1D series is pretty much on a three year timeline. There are a lot of people—myself included—that would like to see a replacement for the 1D Mark III this year. The focus problem in early 1D Mark III bodies is horrible when you run into it and has left a bad taste in many photographers mouths. On the other hand, it’s my understanding that recent Mark III bodies have seen enough improvements in manufacturing that they are pretty solid machines. Almost seems like there has been a silent 'n' release, if you will.
As much as I’d like to see a new 1D Mark IV this year, I think that Canon will stick to their schedule. If so, it would mean we don’t see the Mark IV until early 2010. If I were betting money, I’d be tempted to double down on this bet because of the economic slowdown.
What about the absolute top of the line? The 1Ds series?
- 1Ds, announced 09/2002, 12 months after the 1D
- 1Ds mkII, announced 09/2004, 24 months later, 8 months after the 1D mkII
- 1Ds mkIII, announced 08/2007, 36 months later, 6 months after the 1D mkIII
With the 1Ds, I’m more interested in the lag time after the 1D than anything else. This is because the two cameras are based off the same general platform. The big difference is found in the size and pixel count of the sensor. And, the interesting thing to note here is that the lag is shrinking a little bit each time. One of these days, both the 1D and 1Ds models of the same generation will be announced together. Will it be the upcoming Mark IV? Maybe. Maybe not. My bet is that if we see a Mark IV come out on schedule in the winter of 2010, the 1Ds version will be announced in the spring.
Finally, what about the 5D? Well, the first version was announced in August of 2005. It’s successor came more than three years later. At this rate, the 5D Mark III will be out in 2011 or 2012.
To summarize: look for a new Rebel xx0D model (a 500D?) in summer. The next x0D (a 60D?) could come between August of this year and February of next. If the 1D Mark IV shows up before 2010, I’ll be seriously surprised. And the 5D Mark II will be state of the art for a long time. In other words, unless you’re looking for a new Rebel or getting a new 5D Mark II, the current line up looks to be set for a while.
I’ll close by pointing out that this is all idle speculation based on nothing more than doing a bit of research and finding patterns in the numbers. I could be wrong with some aspect of these guesses. There’s a dozen different ways you can probably come up with your own predictions. And Canon may have a trick up their sleeves—maybe a new product line even—to shake things up. You never know! I welcome your (polite!) speculation in the comments. In the end, we’ll all find out soon enough.
Oh, and if you’re ready to buy a Canon and don’t mind helping a blogger out, feel free to use one of the Amazon links sprinkled through and through.

13 Comments
I'm interested is seeing if Canon will release an updated 50mm f/1.4 lens in the light of renewed interest in fast lenses at this focal length and Sigma's and Nikon's efforts at retooling their designs for shooting wide open.
Ideally they would improve its optical performance at f/1.4, give it a ring-USM as opposed to the failure-prone micro-USM, and retool it so that the front element is fixed.
This isn't really that much to ask, given that the optical performance is already excellent, I'd just like to see build quality more in line with the similarly-priced 85mm f/1.8 and 28mm f/1.8 lenses.
Reply to this comment
Thanks for taking the time to find these patterns. It's very helpful to see these timelines when thinking about purchasing a new camera.
Reply to this comment
Daragh, an updated 50 f/1.4 lens from Canon would be great. The 50 f/1.2 L is a nice lens, but way out of most people's league. The 1.4 needs a bit of modernization in terms of build quality, focus motor, and the like.
Basically, Canon needs to do what Nikon did with their 50G update.
Reply to this comment
Thanks for taking the time to break this down. It is certainly difficult to disagree with the pattern that emerges, even though one might hope that Canon would shorten the time between updates as they have been at this for some time and the available technology is changing much more rapidly than their historic schedule you describe.
What this tells me is that Nikon have struck a great blow in their competition with Canon, perhaps even a knockout blow in the professional market segment to which Canon are unprepared to respond. The Nikon D3 is plainly a game changing product in the sports/photojournalism market. I have used one and the quality of the images at higher ISOs (and reduced need for post processing that many PJs are prohibited from doing) is simply staggering.
While I share the opinion of some others that the D3x is overpriced, Canon's comparable offering is not much less expensive. Should Nikon choose to reduce the price of the D3x to something less than the Canon 1DsMkIII, that segment might well be theirs as well.
It has become clear that Nikon management have been given their marching orders and are proceeding to introduce products to take back market. It remains to be seen if Canon cares to respond or can even if they desire to do so.
Reply to this comment
I think Canon has to update its cameras far sooner than it has in the past to keep up with with Nikon.
The Nikon D3X wiil probably have a lower cost version (D700X?) probably sometime in the next year & if they do Canon will have to respond with an updated 5D mark II maybe with the same focus system as the 1Ds mark III.
Reply to this comment
I think Canon will launch the sports camera sooner (1d mark iv) maybe sometime this year because the pressure from Nikon (D3, D700). Just like the 50D is released 6 months faster than the pattern as a respond to D300.
Reply to this comment
I'm not sure if Canon will release anything outside of their schedule. I've been following things pretty closely with Canon for a while now and they are remarkably conservative in their business practices. True, they have ceded some ground to Nikon, but I am not sure if that will shake them up enough to dramatically alter their release schedules.
That said, I am hoping for a 1D with a full frame, better high ISO sensitivity (its not bad now, but not as good as say... the D3) and GPS embedding. I am a bit of a purist on SLRs and am not really interested in video, but I suspect it will come regardless...
Reply to this comment
i dont think the new models will be out this year. not with the recession 2010 i say
Reply to this comment
18 month? i remember that there is a moll law in the computer field, it said: the CPU speed will redouble every 18 month, does it also comfortable is digital camera field
Reply to this comment
I'm curious about Canon's product development process -- the fixed time, iterative development somehow reminds me of agile in software development. Anyone have info or links?
Reply to this comment
Actually, Moore's law is about the number of transistors that can be placed on a chip doubles every two years. Until recently, processor speed was linked to Moore’s law, but that's now decoupled. Raw speed has been replaced with multiple cores and the like.
Something akin to it is going on with digital cameras. Each generation is significantly better than the previous one. The question is at what point is it "good enough"? We have enough pixels these days. We mostly just want better pixels. Even so, they're pretty damn good right now.
Reply to this comment
Great article, now I knew the timeline and launch history of the camera and can basically predicts when the next replacement will be. Congrats on the research effort!
Reply to this comment
Nice job with this. Thanks.
Reply to this comment
Leave a comment